HostPapa vs Bluehost - Which Is Better?

We have carried out an in-depth BlueHost vs HostPapa comparison as many of our readers are inquiring which one is the better web hosting option. In fact, both of them are reliable and affordable web hosts that have been trusted and recommended by a large number of webmasters for a long period of time, so choosing between them might not be a simple task.

To compare them, we have carefully reviewed every aspect of their hosting service, which include price, features, and technical support. We have also started a performance testing to figure out their uptime and hosting speed, and have collected real customer feedbacks to analyze the industry reputation.

Rating
Plan in Comparison	Professional Plan	Easy Hosting Plan
Reliability
Loading Speed
Technical Support
Feature
Price
Sales Now!	44% Off	44% Off
Starting At	$3.95/mo	$3.95/mo
How to Claim	Link Activation	Link Activation

Price

Coincidentally, the two web hosts set an absolutely same price for their all-on-one web hosting packages, along with an attractive 44% discount that helps customers save a lot.

Regularly, BlueHost customers can purchase the service at the price of $6.99/mo, $7.99/mo, and $8.99/mo for the 3-year, 2-year, and 1-year plan respectively. At present, however, customers can sign up starting at $3.95/mo only by going through this exclusive promotion link.

In terms of HostPapa, customers just can enjoy the same discounted price and set up their websites without costing too much.

Price
Plan in Comparison	Professional Plan	Easy Hosting Plan
Regular Price	$6.99/mo	$6.99/mo
Sales Now!	44% Off	44% Off
Starting At	$3.95/mo	$3.95/mo
How to Claim	Link Activation	Link Activation

In addition to the price, they also allow the same period for full refund that is totaled 30 days. Therefore, if customers are not satisfied with their hosting service and cancel the accounts within the first 30 days of registration, then these people can get their money back without any hassle. The only difference in this aspect is that BlueHost also promises an anytime prorated refund.

Features

Feature
Plan in Comparison	Professional Plan	Easy Hosting Plan
Disk Space	Unlimited	Unlimited
Bandwidth	Unlimited	Unlimited
Domain Hosting	Unlimited	Unlimited
Advertising Credits
Cron
Perl
cPanel
Python
CGI
Ruby on Rails
	Learn More	Not Recommended

Without doubt, the 2 companies are quality web host offering rich-featured hosting packages. For instance, customers can get an unlimited server resource for data storage and transfer, a user-friendly cPanel control for website management, and an automatic 1-click installer for script installation. In addition, customers can also enjoy a great amount of advertising credits for online marketing, which include Google AdWords, Facebook, and Bing/Yahoo!, etc.

To be honest, all of these features are especially useful for new webmasters. However, when considering some advanced programming languages that are attractive for geeks, BlueHost is better as it also provides customers with Python, Ruby on Rails, and CGI that are not included in HostPapa hosting package.

Uptime

Both of the 2 companies are claiming to guarantee at least 99% uptime, and have utilized quality web servers and world-class data centers to keep this promise in the real world. BlueHost, in particular, leverages the power of 100% DELL servers running CentOS 6 to ensure the highest level of stability, reliability, and security. Besides, it has invested millions of dollars to design and build its own data centers that are coming with redundant power supply, advanced security technologies, automatic climate control, and 24/7 monitoring system. Thus, all the robust web servers are ensured to work properly and uninterruptedly.

As monitored for more than 3 months, BlueHost achieves a 100% uptime while HostPapa achieves an average of 99.87%.

Hosting Speed

In addition to reliability, we also have tested their hosting speed. After monitoring the server response of the 2 tested websites that are hosted with them respectively, BlueHost is up to 62% faster than HostPapa, achieving a swift server response time of 320ms on average.