BlueHost vs ANHosting - Web Hosting Review And Comparison

The BlueHost vs ANHosting web hosting comparison is mainly based on verified customer reviews and our real hosting experience with these 2 companies. Due to the fact that both of the 2 companies set an affordable price that is starting at $3.95/mo, we mainly compare their features, uptime, hosting speed, and technical support.

Until now, we have been hosting 2 small sites with the 2 companies for about 1 year, and kept monitoring the sites closely for months.Besides, we have collected a lot of information on the web to make clear other real customers’ voice. Based on our hosting experience and teh information we collected, we have made the following rating table.

Price Value

In fact, the pricing of their hosting service is absolutely affordable. BlueHost offers a 44% discount that allows customers to purchase starting at $3.95/mo instead of the initial rate of $6.99/mo by going through this special promotion link. ANHosting also provides an attractive discount that reduces the price from $5.95/mo to $3.95/mo.

Besides, both of them guarantee 30 days full refund and anytime prorated money back, so customers can purchase a long term billing cycle without the need to worry about money wasting.

Considering a truly quality service should not only be budget-friendly, but also be rich-featured, both of them also offer a lot of competitive features to better support their customers, such as free domain name, cPanel control panel, 1-click installer, as well as unlimited allocation of disk space, monthly bandwidth, e-mail accounts, and domain hosting.

In terms of website marketing, BlueHost provides $100 for Google AdWords, $50 for Twitter, and $50 for Facebook, but ANHosting just fails to offer this benefit.

More details about features are listed in the following table.

Hosting Performance

In fact, both of the 2 companies claim to guarantee at least 99% uptime and fast page loading speed that is less than 1 second on average. To figure out whether they can fully meet the promises, we have reviewed their web server and data center infrastructure carefully as the two factors play a vital role in hosting performance.

Web Servers

• BlueHost utilizes the self-designed and self-built web server to host websites, running dual quad processor and featuring 64GB DDR3 memory, RAID 10 SATA3, and 1000MBits intranet connection to routers.
• ANHosting also uses robust Cloud Linux servers to guarantee the highest level of security, stability, reliability, and performance.

Data Center

• BlueHost has invested millions of dollars to set up three world-class data centers, which are equipped with diesel generators for uninterrupted power supply, multiple 10 gigabit Ethernet connections for fast Ethernet frames transmission, and advanced cooling system for climate control. All of these facilities are monitored 24/7 with a group experts and cutting-edge technologies.
• The c7 data center utilized by ANHosting is a Tier-3 one that is constructed with a lot of advanced and reliable technologies and is SAS 70 Type II compliant, making sure that all the servers can run properly and unceasingly.

Without doubt, these 2 companies are theoretically able to guarantee a good uptime track record and fast hosting speed with quality web servers and data centers.

To better compare them in this aspect, we have set up 2 WordPress sites that include the same content, and have gotten them hosted with the two providers respectively. After monitoring the online availability and server response time, both of them have achieved a good uptime track record. In terms of hosting speed, however, the site hosted with BlueHost is faster, consuming 320ms on average.

Technical Support

Both BlueHost and ANHosting provide customers with an excellent technical support. The service is available 24 hours a day and 7 days a week, so customers can ask for help at any time they need. Besides, the support methods are various, which include toll-free phone call, live chat, and e-mail, so customers can choose the most convenient one according to their real situations.

In terms of support staffs, all of these people are well-trained, being able to deal with any issues raised by customers effectively with the most professional manner. As investigated, almost all of their customers have had a perfect support experience.

Summary

According to this comparison, both of the 2 companies are quality web hosting providers that are worth purchasing, but for people who wish more features and faster hosting speed, BlueHost is undoubtedly the better option.